Skip to content
Food additive details

DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE

CAS: 28631-86-9 FLAVORING AGENT OR ADJUVANT

DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE (CAS 28631-86-9) is an aromatic dihydroxy ketone used as a food flavoring agent, recognized for its green and nutty sensory profile and evaluated by expert panels on flavoring substances.

What It Is

DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE is an organic compound with the Chemical Abstracts Service registry number 28631-86-9 and belongs to the class of dihydroxy ketones derived from acetophenone. It is identified by multiple synonyms reflecting its structural variants and is cataloged as a flavoring agent or adjuvant in food ingredient inventories. This compound has been evaluated by flavoring ingredient panels and appears in lists of substances added to food, indicating its use in enhancing or modifying flavor profiles. As a flavoring agent, the technical identity of DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE comprises substituted phenolic ethanones that contribute unique sensory characteristics when used at very low levels, often below perceptible taste thresholds. It is recognized by expert bodies assigning it a FEMA number, which serves as a registration identifier for flavoring ingredients evaluated for safety and use in food products. The compound’s structure includes a substituted phenyl ring bearing multiple hydroxy functional groups attached to an acetophenone backbone, which influences both its solubility and sensory properties. In regulatory and ingredient classification systems, DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE is grouped with other flavoring agents that do not serve nutritional or preservative functions but are used solely to impart or enhance desired flavors in complex food matrices. It is not considered a food nutrient or essential additive in processing, but rather a specialist component in flavor development and formulation studies.

How It Is Made

The manufacturing of DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE typically involves chemical synthesis processes starting from acetophenone precursors that are functionalized to introduce hydroxy substituents on the aromatic ring. These synthesis steps are designed to produce a mixture of positional isomers with specific quality characteristics suitable for use as flavoring agents. The starting material is often acetophenone, and the introduction of hydroxy groups can be achieved through controlled oxidation or aromatic substitution reactions under conditions optimized to favor the desired product profile. Purification and quality control are critical aspects of production, given that flavoring agents must meet defined specifications for identity, purity, and sensory performance. Industrial processes generally include distillation, recrystallization, or chromatographic separation to remove unwanted byproducts or isomeric variants that do not contribute to the target flavor profile. Final products are tested against analytical standards to ensure consistency and compliance with flavoring specification requirements published by expert committees. Because the compound is used at trace levels in food formulations, high purity is emphasized to minimize off-flavors and potential interactions with other ingredients. The technical specification documents made available through international food safety databases describe minimum assay percentages and the physical form of the additive, such as crystalline solids, which help manufacturers and food scientists integrate the ingredient into flavor systems. End-use quality attributes like odor and thermal stability are also assessed during production to ensure the compound performs as expected in typical food processing conditions.

Why It Is Used In Food

DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE is used in food primarily for its role as a flavoring agent or adjuvant, meaning it contributes to or modifies the sensory characteristics of food products. Food formulators leverage its unique sensory notes, often described in specialist literature as green, vegetative, or nutty, to enhance the complexity of flavor profiles in certain categories. The compound’s inclusion is typically at levels that will not dominate the overall flavor but rather complement and balance other sensory elements in a formulation. Flavoring agents such as this are particularly valuable in products where nuanced taste characteristics are needed, such as savory snacks, beverages, or confectionery items. Its functional effect is tied to its molecular structure, which allows interactions with olfactory receptors in a manner that is perceived as a specific aroma or taste nuance by consumers. Unlike basic seasonings that provide fundamental tastes like saltiness or sweetness, specialized flavoring agents help craft signature flavors that differentiate products in a competitive marketplace. In addition to direct flavor contributions, certain additives can act as adjuvants to enhance the perception of other flavors or mask undesirable notes that may arise from processing or ingredient variations. DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE’s use in complex flavor systems underscores its technical value in product development, where subtle modulation of sensory profiles is essential. Its inclusion must consider compatibility with other ingredients and the conditions of the food matrix, including pH and temperature, as these can influence how the compound expresses its sensory attributes.

Adi Example Calculation

To illustrate how an acceptable daily intake is interpreted, imagine a hypothetical ADI of X milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day for a flavoring agent. For a person weighing 70 kilograms, the total allowable intake over a day would be 70 times X. This hypothetical calculation shows how body weight influences the absolute amount of a substance corresponding to the ADI. It is not a recommendation to consume that level but rather a safety benchmark used in regulatory assessments. In cases where no numeric ADI is established because expected intake is extremely low, this type of calculation reinforces the understanding that typical dietary exposure to flavoring agents is small relative to the thresholds of toxicological concern. Food scientists and regulators use these frameworks to ensure that product formulations and usage levels are set appropriately. The absence of a defined numeric ADI in specific evaluations reflects the low exposure context rather than a lack of safety assessment. This illustrative example underscores that ADI values are tools used in safety evaluation and regulatory decision-making, and not guidance on how much of a flavoring agent consumers should seek to ingest. Actual levels of these compounds in foods are often orders of magnitude below conservative safety benchmarks.

Safety And Health Research

Evaluations of flavoring agents such as DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE typically focus on toxicological endpoints relevant to their use at low levels in food, including assessments of potential genotoxicity, chronic toxicity, and metabolic fate. Expert panels like JECFA and FEMA conduct reviews of available data to determine whether a substance can be considered safe under intended conditions of use. These evaluations draw on studies of structural analogs, metabolism, and available animal data to inform risk assessments. The outcome of these reviews is reflected in inclusion on flavoring substance inventories. Safety considerations for this compound are guided by the principle that exposure from food use is minimal compared to levels that raise toxicological concern. Food safety frameworks use conservative exposure estimates and safety factors to ensure that typical consumer intake remains well below levels associated with adverse effects in experimental systems. For many flavoring agents, specific toxicological data may be limited due to the very low intake levels at which they are used, but expert committees apply structured evaluation approaches to address data gaps. Continued monitoring and research may refine understanding of any additive’s safety profile over time. Regulated use of flavoring agents is supported by cumulative scientific evidence and expert consensus, with updates to specifications and evaluations published by organizations responsible for food additive safety. These activities contribute to maintaining confidence that such compounds, when used in accordance with regulatory guidance, do not pose undue risk to public health.

Regulatory Status Worldwide

DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE appears on ingredient inventories that track substances added to food, indicating it has been evaluated for use as a flavoring agent. In the United States, it is listed in the database formerly known as EAFUS (Substances Added to Food), which catalogs flavoring agents and other ingredients that may be used in food formulations under current regulatory frameworks. The listing reflects expert assessments by bodies such as the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA), which assigns a unique FEMA number to flavoring substances and compiles safety evaluations relevant to their use. Globally, DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE is identified with a JECFA number in the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives flavoring database, indicating it has been subject to review for identity and specification. These expert evaluations focus on technical function and safety when used as intended at flavoring levels. However, specific regulatory permissions and maximum usage levels are determined by individual jurisdictions and are not universally harmonized for all compounds of this class. In the European Union and other regions, flavoring agents are regulated within frameworks that require documentation of safety and quality, often referencing lists maintained by competent authorities. While DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE’s presence in expert databases signifies recognition by scientific panels, formal authorization with explicit numeric limits may vary by jurisdiction. Users of the additive should refer to local regulatory texts for detailed allowances, as international listings of flavoring substances provide the foundation for, but do not substitute for, country-specific regulatory requirements.

Taste And Functional Properties

The taste and functional properties of DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE stem from its aromatic chemical structure, which interacts with sensory receptors to produce distinct aroma impressions. Sensory descriptions available from industry databases characterize the compound as having green, vegetative, fatty, and nutty notes, sometimes with mushroom or peanut-like nuances. These are complex sensory descriptors that suggest the additive contributes more than basic taste, appealing to deeper olfactory pathways that shape flavor perception. From a functional standpoint, DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE’s solubility characteristics and stability under typical food processing conditions influence how it is formulated into products. While it may have limited solubility in water, it can be adequately dispersed in alcohol or other solvent systems used in flavor blends. This functional behavior ensures that when incorporated at recommended usage levels, the compound can deliver its sensory effect without precipitating or interacting unfavorably with other ingredients. Heat and pH stability of flavoring agents are essential considerations for food formulators, as many products undergo thermal processing or encounter varying pH environments during production and storage. The specific stability profile of DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE is assessed through technical specifications, which inform formulators about its resilience to such conditions. The interplay between structural stability and sensory expression guides decisions about its inclusion in products that may be cooked, fermented, or stored for extended periods.

Acceptable Daily Intake Explained

An acceptable daily intake (ADI) is a scientific estimate of the amount of a substance that can be consumed daily over a lifetime without appreciable health risk, expressed relative to body weight. For many flavoring agents, including DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE, an explicit numeric ADI may not be established if the expected exposure from food use is deemed negligible or if expert evaluations determine that typical intake does not warrant a formal ADI. In such cases, safety evaluations focus on ensuring that use levels remain within bounds that do not raise toxicological concerns. The ADI concept incorporates safety factors to account for uncertainties in extrapolating from experimental data to human exposure scenarios. These factors ensure that even sensitive individuals are protected. When an ADI is assigned by authoritative bodies like JECFA or EFSA, it is based on available toxicological data and conservative exposure assessments. For flavoring agents without a defined ADI, expert panels may conclude that exposure from intended use is sufficiently low that specific limits are unnecessary, provided that quality specifications and usage practices are followed. Consumers may encounter ADI values in regulatory texts or safety evaluations, but it is important to recognize that these are technical benchmarks rather than recommendations for daily intake. They serve as guidance for manufacturers and regulators to ensure that the total contribution of a given additive to the diet remains within safe bounds, taking into account all known uses and exposure pathways.

Comparison With Similar Additives

Flavoring agents like DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE share functional similarities with other aromatic compounds used to modulate sensory profiles in food. For example, benzaldehyde derivatives provide almond-like notes, while certain phenolic ketones contribute spicy or smoky characteristics. These compounds are selected based on the specific sensory outcome desired in a formulation, and their structural diversity underpins a wide range of flavor effects. Compared to simple esters that impart fruity notes or basic aldehydes that deliver citrus impressions, dihydroxy-substituted ketones such as DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE offer more complex, earthy, or vegetative sensory cues. This makes them appropriate for nuanced applications where blending multiple flavor notes is required. The choice among such additives depends on factors including desired taste profile, processing conditions, and compatibility with other ingredients. While all flavoring agents undergo safety evaluations, the depth and type of data available can vary. Some well-studied compounds like vanillin have extensive toxicological databases and established ADIs, whereas others used at very low levels may not have numeric ADIs but are still considered safe within their use context. Understanding these differences helps formulators and regulators make informed decisions about blending and usage in diverse food products.

Common Food Applications Narrative

DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE is found in a variety of food and beverage applications where nuanced sensory enhancement is desired. As a flavoring agent with a green and nutty sensory profile, it is suited to products that benefit from subtle aromatic complexity. Examples include savory snacks where vegetal and fatty notes can enrich the overall flavor experience and contribute to product uniqueness. In beverages, particularly those with botanical or herbal character, the compound can support aromatic layering that appeals to consumers seeking more intricate taste profiles. Confectionery and bakery products may also incorporate this ingredient as part of a broader flavoring blend, helping to round out or sharpen specific notes without overwhelming the primary taste components. The versatility of flavoring agents lies in their ability to interact synergistically with other ingredients, providing balance or contrast depending on the formulation goals. In each case, usage levels are typically very low, reflecting both safety considerations and the potent nature of these compounds in sensory perception. Food product developers will select DIHYDROXYACETOPHENONE not for fundamental taste qualities like sweetness or saltiness, but for its ability to refine and tailor complex flavor matrices. Whether in snack foods, beverages, or specialty items, such flavoring agents contribute to the sensory signature that defines a product, helping manufacturers meet consumer expectations for depth, character, and differentiation in taste.

Safety & Regulations

FDA

  • Notes: Listing in the FDA substances added to food inventory does not itself constitute a formal approval determination.

EFSA

  • Notes: No explicit EFSA authorization or numeric ADI found in available regulatory sources.

JECFA

  • Notes: JECFA specification exists, but no numeric ADI or year of acceptance explicitly shown on d documentation.

Sources

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share!