Skip to content
Food additive details

DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE

CAS: 74595-94-1 FLAVORING AGENT OR ADJUVANT

**DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE** is a synthetic organic sulfur-containing heterocyclic compound used in flavor formulations, especially for imparting roasted, meaty notes in savory applications.

What It Is

DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE is a synthetic flavoring agent belonging to the class of heterocyclic organosulfur compounds with branching alkyl chains. It is identified by the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry number 74595-94-1, and it also appears in flavoring databases under alternative identifiers including FEMA 4017 and a JECFA (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives) number 1048, indicating its recognition as a flavor component in international flavor specifications. The compound is characterized by a 1,3,5-dithiazine ring structure with three 2-methylpropyl substituents, conferring a distinctive molecular framework that contributes to its sensory attributes. In practical use, this ingredient functions primarily as a flavoring agent or flavor adjuvant, meaning it is added to food formulations to modify or enhance the inherent taste profile of products. It is considered a specialized ingredient within the broader category of synthetic flavoring substances commonly utilized to create or intensify savory, roasted, and meat-like notes in complex food matrices. These properties have made it of interest in flavor chemistry, particularly in products where rich umami and cooked aroma characteristics are desired. As a heterocyclic sulfur compound, it is part of a group of molecules with organosulfur functionality that plays a central role in generating intense and recognizable flavor attributes at very low concentration levels. Its classification as a flavoring agent or adjuvant reflects industry nomenclature rather than a regulatory approval status on its own, and careful interpretation of regulatory listings is necessary to understand where and how it may be used in foods based on international evaluations and inventories.

How It Is Made

The synthesis of DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE typically involves multi-step chemical reactions starting from readily available small organic precursors such as aldehydes and elemental sulfur or sulfur equivalents. In general, heterocyclic organosulfur compounds of this type can be formed by first generating an imine intermediate from an aldehyde and ammonia, followed by reaction with hydrogen sulfide or a sulfide donor under controlled conditions to form the dithiazine ring. This produces the core 1,3,5-dithiazine structure which is further alkylated or functionalized to introduce the specific 2-methylpropyl substituents. Commercial production processes for flavor ingredients emphasize careful control of reaction parameters like temperature, pH, and reagent purity to ensure that the desired product is obtained with sufficient quality for food use. After the synthesis and purification steps, the resulting compound is typically subjected to analytical characterization, including chromatographic and spectroscopic methods, to confirm identity and assess purity. Specifications for food flavoring substances often include defined analytical criteria, such as chromatographic purity and acceptable levels of related impurities, which help to ensure consistency and safety in use. Although exact proprietary manufacturing routes can vary between producers and are often not publicly disclosed, the underlying chemistry reflects standard organic synthesis techniques used in the flavor and fragrance industry. The process typically uses inert atmospheres to prevent undesirable side reactions, and modern industrial practice emphasizes waste minimization and solvent recovery to mitigate environmental impact. Good laboratory and manufacturing practices (GLP/GMP) are applied to ensure that the final material meets established quality benchmarks for flavor ingredients.

Why It Is Used In Food

Flavoring agents like DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE are used in food formulations primarily to impart or enhance specific sensory attributes that might otherwise be absent or muted in the base ingredients. In particular, sulfur-containing heterocyclic compounds are well known in flavor science for their ability to deliver complex, savory, and roasted aroma profiles even at very low concentrations. These sensory characteristics are crucial in products where a rich, cooked, or meat-like quality is desired, such as savory snacks, seasonings, broth and soup bases, and certain processed foods. The use of such specialized flavoring agents allows food developers to fine-tune the overall sensory impact of a product without relying solely on natural ingredients. This can be particularly important in situations where natural sources of flavor are either too variable in composition, too expensive, or otherwise unsuitable for large-scale commercial production. For example, in a plant-based meat analogue formulation, synthetic flavoring agents with defined sensory profiles can be used to mimic the characteristic roasted and savory notes of cooked meat. Moreover, flavor adjuvants like this compound can interact synergistically with other flavor ingredients to enhance the perception of depth, complexity, and overall palatability. This functional role extends beyond mere aroma delivery; it can influence how other flavors are perceived by impacting flavor release and persistence on the palate. These factors are critical in designing products that meet consumer expectations for taste, especially in highly competitive market segments where sensory differentiation is key to product success.

Adi Example Calculation

An illustrative ADI example is provided here only to explain how such a calculation would be performed in general, not to represent an actual regulatory ADI for DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE. For a hypothetical flavoring agent with an ADI of X mg per kg body weight per day, one would calculate daily intake for a given body weight by multiplying X by the individual’s weight. For example, if X were 1 mg/kg/day, a person weighing 70 kg would have a theoretical ADI of 70 mg per day. In practice, flavoring agents are often used at microgram to low milligram levels per serving, and actual dietary exposures are typically several orders of magnitude below such hypothetical ADIs. The actual use levels for this compound are carefully calibrated based on flavor potency and sensory targets, and expert panels consider these use levels when assessing overall exposure and safety within a flavor design context.

Safety And Health Research

Regulatory and safety research on flavoring agents like DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE focuses on understanding both hazard and exposure. Flavoring agents are evaluated on their chemical structure, potential toxicological endpoints including genotoxicity, subchronic toxicity, and any evidence of adverse effects at conceivable dietary levels. Expert panels such as FEMA’s Flavor Ingredient Library operate by reviewing available scientific data and recommending whether a substance can be considered generally recognized as safe under intended conditions of use, which often includes estimated intake levels and structural class assessments that inform risk analysis. International bodies like JECFA conduct systematic evaluations of flavoring agents as part of broader assessments of food additives. Their evaluations consider available toxicological data, metabolic pathways, and human exposure estimates to determine if there are safety concerns at anticipated use levels. JECFA’s searchable database allows stakeholders to locate specifications and summary evaluations where available, but detailed numeric safety thresholds or acceptable daily intake (ADI) values for specific flavoring compounds are not always present in publicly accessible summary records. () When numerical safety metrics are absent, it typically reflects either a lack of sufficient toxicological data or the classification of the compound within a structure‑based group where individual evaluations have not yielded distinct ADI values. Safety assessments often use a threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) approach for flavoring agents with limited data, evaluating them within structural groups with established low exposure expectations. Toxicologists also assess the potential for genotoxicity or other hazard endpoints using both in vitro and in vivo data to identify any concerns that may warrant more refined evaluation. Since detailed safety evaluations for this compound are not widely published in open regulatory literature, assertions about specific health effects cannot be made here. Instead, consumers and industry stakeholders should interpret safety in the context of expert panel reviews and established exposure assessment methodologies used to support flavor ingredient evaluations at international and regional levels.

Regulatory Status Worldwide

The regulatory landscape for flavoring agents like DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE varies by jurisdiction and depends on whether authorities have explicitly evaluated and approved its use. In the United States, there is no direct listing for this specific compound within the primary food additive regulations under Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Instead, flavoring substances may appear in the Substances Added to Food inventory, which includes items that have been evaluated by expert bodies such as the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) Expert Panel and/or the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) for use as flavor ingredients, but inclusion alone does not constitute formal FDA approval as a regulated food additive under CFR provisions. The FDA Substances Added to Food inventory notes that flavoring substances can be evaluated by FEMA and JECFA, and their presence in such inventories indicates recognized use in flavor formulations rather than regulatory endorsement under specific CFR sections. The inventory description clarifies that inclusion from non‑FDA entities does not equate to FDA approval for specific food uses. (, ) Internationally, the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives provides an established platform for evaluating flavoring agents based on toxicological and exposure data. The JECFA database allows stakeholders to search for flavoring substances by criteria such as CAS number or FEMA number, and it presents specifications and evaluation summaries for items that have been considered. While DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE is associated with a JECFA flavoring number (1048), specific safety thresholds or acceptable daily intake values are not readily accessible in publicly searchable documents without direct deep links to evaluation reports. (, ) In the European Union, flavoring substances are generally assessed through EFSA’s flavoring group evaluations, where structurally related compounds are grouped and evaluated for safety. The presence of this compound in lists of representative substances for testing indicates that it has been identified for further evaluation under regulatory frameworks such as Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. However, authoritative EFSA opinions specific to this compound are not easily retrievable without accessing detailed group evaluation documents. Overall, while this ingredient is recognized and used within the flavor industry, formal regulatory status for use in foods can differ by region, and licensors or formulators should consult specific regulatory listings and expert panel determinations applicable in their target markets.

Taste And Functional Properties

DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE is recognized in flavor circles for its distinct sensory character, typically described as imparting roasted, meaty, or savory notes at low use levels. Organosulfur compounds often exhibit potent flavor attributes because sulfur atoms within heterocyclic structures interact strongly with human olfactory receptors, generating complex aroma perceptions even when present in trace amounts. This makes such compounds valuable in flavor formulations aiming to replicate cooked or caramelized profiles. In terms of functional properties, this ingredient is generally incorporated into flavor blends rather than used alone. It is soluble in organic solvents commonly employed in flavor manufacturing, such as propylene glycol, ethanol, or triacetin, which serve as carriers that facilitate uniform distribution in the final food or beverage formulation. Solubility in water is limited due to the hydrophobic nature of the alkyl chains and heterocyclic core structure, which influences how it is formulated in aqueous systems. Thermally, sulfur-containing heterocyclic flavor compounds can exhibit stability under typical food processing conditions, but like all flavor ingredients, their integrity depends on the specific matrix and processing parameters such as temperature, pH, and presence of reactive food components. High heat and oxidative environments can alter delicate flavor molecules; therefore, formulation scientists often select appropriate carriers and protective strategies to retain desired sensory attributes during processing and storage. From a sensory perspective, the impact of this compound on a flavor profile is context dependent. In robust savory applications, it contributes to a rounded and rich sensory impression that complements other ingredients like amino acid derivatives, roasted notes, and umami enhancers. Its use is typically balanced within a larger flavor design to achieve the targeted sensory outcome without overpowering other complementary notes.

Acceptable Daily Intake Explained

An acceptable daily intake (ADI) is a toxicological concept used by regulatory and expert bodies to represent the amount of a substance that can be consumed daily over a lifetime without appreciable health risk, based on available data and with appropriate safety factors built into the calculation. For flavoring agents, including heterocyclic organosulfur compounds, ADIs are typically established only when there is sufficient toxicological information such as subchronic toxicity studies, genotoxicity assessments, and metabolic data. In the case of DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE, specific numeric ADI values are not readily available in publicly accessible JECFA or other regulatory summaries, and thus a defined ADI cannot be confidently presented here. The absence of an explicit ADI in open regulatory documentation often reflects either limited data availability or evaluations conducted under broader structural grouping methodologies that do not yield individual numeric thresholds. When such values are determined by expert committees, they are usually published alongside detailed evaluation reports or monographs accessible through dedicated regulatory databases. The ADI concept itself is not a recommended target level of intake for individuals, but rather a risk assessment tool used by regulators and manufacturers to guide safe use levels in food formulations. It incorporates safety factors to ensure that even sensitive populations are unlikely to experience adverse effects at or below that intake level. Without a clearly defined ADI for this compound, formulation decisions rely on exposure estimates, intended use levels, and expert panel guidance to ensure that typical dietary exposures remain well within conservative safety bounds as determined by flavor industry evaluations.

Comparison With Similar Additives

DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE shares functional similarities with other sulfur-containing flavoring agents that deliver savory or roasted sensory qualities, such as thiazoles, thiophenes, and certain sulfides. Compared with simpler sulfur compounds like methional or dimethyl sulfide, heterocyclic sulfur compounds often provide more complex and sustained aroma impressions at lower use levels due to their ring structures and increased molecular complexity. These structural features influence how they interact with olfactory receptors and contribute to layered flavor profiles. In practical flavor formulation, this compound may be used alongside other savory enhancers such as Maillard reaction products derived from controlled heating of amino acids and sugars, which deliver roasted and caramelized notes. Unlike Maillard-derived natural flavors, synthetic heterocyclic compounds like this one can be formulated with high purity and consistency, which is advantageous for reproducible product quality. However, the presence of multiple sulfur atoms and the heterocyclic core can make sensory balancing more challenging, requiring precise use levels to achieve the desired effect without introducing off-notes. Another class of flavoring substances with related functional roles includes pyrazines, which also contribute roasted, nutty, or toasted notes but with a nitrogen-containing heterocyclic core. Pyrazines differ in sensory character from sulfur heterocycles in that they often convey more nutty or toasted aspects rather than deep meaty notes. By contrast, sulfur heterocycles like DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE are preferred in applications where rich meat-like or savory depth is desired. The choice between these classes depends on the target sensory profile and the interaction with other flavor ingredients within a given product formulation.

Common Food Applications Narrative

DIHYDRO-2,4,6-TRIS(2-METHYLPROPYL)-4H-1,3,5-DITHIAZINE finds application in an array of food products where a savory, roasted, or meat-like sensory character is desirable. Within savory snack seasonings, this class of flavor components can contribute depth and complexity to chips or crackers seasoned with barbecue or roasted meat flavor profiles. In broth and stock products, flavoring agents with sulfur-based notes help deliver the perception of slow-cooked meat or roasted vegetables, enhancing the richness and fullness of the overall taste experience. In processed and ready-to-eat meals, particularly those with beef, chicken, or plant-based analogues, such specialized flavoring compounds are often blended with other natural and synthetic ingredients to create nuanced sensory attributes that replicate familiar culinary experiences. For example, in gravies and sauces, they support the perception of caramelization and roasted proteins, enriching the palette of tastes that consumers associate with comfort foods. Similarly, in seasonings for dried soups or seasoning packets, they help achieve a satisfying savory base that can elevate simple preparations. Cheese-flavored products and flavored dairy-derived sauces also benefit from the inclusion of heterocyclic sulfur flavoring agents, which can enhance the roasted and cooked notes that harmonize with inherent dairy characteristics. Even in composite products such as seasoned nuts, meat rubs, or snack bars, carefully calibrated flavor blends incorporating this compound contribute to the desired sensory profile without introducing unwanted off-notes. Across these applications, formulation scientists balance this ingredient with other flavor agents to achieve a coherent and consumer‑friendly taste. Because such compounds are potent in their sensory impact, they are typically used in micro quantities, calculated precisely to complement rather than dominate the full flavor profile. This approach ensures that the final products deliver consistent, appealing sensory experiences that align with consumer expectations for savory and roasted food categories.

Explore familiar flavors

Explore ingredients and foods linked to this familiar flavor.

Flavor ideas

Mushroom base for soups

A spoonful of mushroom base can add depth to soups, sauces, and weeknight dishes.

Explore soup bases

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This is at no additional cost to you.

Safety & Regulations

FDA

  • Notes: No specific FDA food additive regulation listing was identified; presence in industry flavor inventories does not establish formal FDA approval.

EFSA

  • Notes: No explicit EFSA numeric ADI or E-number found in publicly available evaluations.

JECFA

  • Notes: JECFA number is associated (1048) but specific numeric ADI or evaluation year was not confirmed from available JECFA summaries.

Sources

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share!