GUTTA HANG KANG (PALAQUIUM LEIOCARPUM BOERL. AND P. OBLONGIFOLIUM BURCK.)
GUTTA HANG KANG is a plant‑derived masticatory substance permitted as an ingredient in chewing gum base under U.S. FDA regulation 21 CFR 172.615. Its regulatory use is limited to technical roles in food formulations.
What It Is
GUTTA HANG KANG (PALAQUIUM LEIOCARPUM BOERL. AND P. OBLONGIFOLIUM BURCK.) is a naturally sourced masticatory substance that has been recognized for use in food products by regulatory authorities. This material, often referred to in industry as gums or resins, is comprised of plant exudates from species of the Palaquium genus. The substance is identified by the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry number 9007‑97‑0, confirming its unique classification and facilitating regulatory tracking. In the context of food ingredient inventories, it is listed under chewing gum base components, acting as a structural and functional element rather than providing flavor or nutrition. In regulatory listings such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Substances Added to Food inventory (formerly EAFUS), GUTTA HANG KANG appears with its technical effect described as a masticatory substance, indicating its role in nonnutritive components of food formulations, particularly confectionery bases. It is not typically used as a flavor active or nutritive ingredient but forms part of composite materials that impart chewability and texture. This distinction places it among specialized additives with defined and limited uses within food systems. Furthermore, its inclusion in regulatory lists underscores that it meets criteria for identity and permitted use in the jurisdictions where it is listed, subject to compliance with specified conditions. Because this ingredient comes from botanical sources, it is composed of complex natural polymers and related resinous fractions rather than a single defined chemical entity. This complexity contributes to its functional behavior in food systems but also means that common safety evaluations address the material as a whole rather than focusing solely on a single chemical structure. In professional ingredient references, it may also be described using synonyms that reflect its resinous nature or botanical origin, reinforcing its categorization as a chewing gum base component rather than a simple isolated chemical.
How It Is Made
The production of GUTTA HANG KANG begins with the harvesting of botanical exudates from select tree species belonging to the genus Palaquium. Traditionally, these trees are tapped in a manner similar to rubber extraction, where incisions are made in the bark and the latex‑like sap is collected. This natural exudate contains a complex mixture of polyisoprene polymers and resinous components that solidify upon exposure to air. Once collected, the raw material undergoes cleaning and processing to remove impurities such as soil, bark fragments, and excess moisture. The initial material often takes on irregular shapes and may contain variable proportions of resin and polymeric constituents. Through gentle heating and mechanical working, manufacturers refine the substance to produce a more uniform gum‑like base that is suitable for food formulation. These processing steps may include washing, filtration, and pressing to achieve a consistent texture and physical behavior appropriate for incorporation into food matrices. The final product is therefore a concentrated form of the original plant resin with predictable functional qualities. Because the source is botanical, natural variability can influence the composition of each batch. Quality control measures typically focus on physical and functional attributes rather than pure chemical composition, ensuring that the processed material meets specifications for chewing gum base use. It is not synthesized through modern petrochemical or polymer chemistry pathways; rather, it is a refined natural product. This origin underscores the importance of adhering to defined processing standards to ensure consistency and regulatory compliance in food applications.
Why It Is Used In Food
GUTTA HANG KANG is included in food formulations primarily for its functional contribution to texture and structure, particularly in products that require a nonnutritive, chewable base. In confectionery applications such as chewing gum, this material serves as a foundational matrix that provides the desired elasticity and resilience. Unlike nutritive ingredients that contribute calories or flavor, its role is to create and maintain physical form. Regulatory inventories list GUTTA HANG KANG specifically as a masticatory substance due to its ability to form a base that can be chewed without dissolving readily. This characteristic is essential in products where prolonged chewability and mechanical integrity are important for consumer experience. Because of its structural properties, it can support other components like softeners, sweeteners, and flavorings by providing a stable medium. Its use enables product developers to tailor texture profiles to meet consumer expectations for firmness, elasticity, and mouthfeel. The application of such substances is typically limited to specific categories of food products where texture is a primary consideration. In chewing gum bases and other similar masticatory systems, components like GUTTA HANG KANG act as inert carriers rather than active nutritional ingredients. Their inclusion is guided by regulatory standards that define permitted substances and their technical functions, ensuring they are used only where appropriate and in compliance with food safety expectations.
Adi Example Calculation
Because GUTTA HANG KANG does not have an established numeric acceptable daily intake (ADI) published by authoritative bodies, a concrete illustrative calculation cannot be provided. In regulatory practice, an ADI is calculated when toxicological data support a quantifiable threshold. For example, if an ADI of X mg per kg body weight per day were established, an illustrative calculation for a person weighing 70 kg would multiply X mg by 70 to estimate the maximum daily exposure considered safe. Without a defined numeric ADI for this ingredient, such calculations are not meaningful. It is important to understand that the absence of a numeric ADI does not necessarily indicate a safety concern; rather, it may reflect regulatory focus on permitted use categories and historical context of use. Substances used in limited functional applications such as chewing gum bases are often evaluated in that context, and regulatory listings authorize their use without issuing specific intake thresholds. As a result, consumers encountering products containing this ingredient are unlikely to exceed any safety margins when the ingredient is used according to regulatory permissions.
Safety And Health Research
Safety evaluations for food additives like GUTTA HANG KANG focus on the potential for adverse effects when consumed in the context of normal product use. Regulatory authorities assess available toxicological information, including data on chemical composition, sources, and any relevant studies involving ingestion. In many cases, materials derived from complex natural sources such as plant resins are reviewed on the basis of historical use and expert assessment rather than extensive controlled toxicological trials. For ingredients used in chewing gum base applications, safety considerations include the likelihood of systemic exposure and the fate of the material after ingestion. Because masticatory bases are largely nonnutritive and may not be significantly absorbed in the digestive tract, evaluations often emphasize the absence of harmful breakdown products or contaminants in the finished material. Regulatory listings in inventories such as the FDA’s EAFUS demonstrate that authorities have determined that the material meets criteria for safe use under specified conditions. It is important to recognize that safety research for such substances may not be as extensive as for widely used food additives like sweeteners or preservatives. The available regulatory documentation indicates permitted status rather than detailed toxicological profiles with numeric thresholds. Accordingly, narrative safety assessments emphasize compliance with identity and purity criteria set by regulatory lists, ensuring that the material meets standards for the specified functional application.
Regulatory Status Worldwide
In the United States, GUTTA HANG KANG is recognized in regulatory inventories as a permitted ingredient under the category of chewing gum base. The FDA’s Substances Added to Food inventory (formerly EAFUS) lists it with CAS number 9007‑97‑0 and identifies its technical effect as a masticatory substance, referencing regulatory authority 21 CFR 172.615 for chewing gum base components. This listing indicates that it is permitted for use in the manufacture of chewing gum products when used in accordance with specified regulatory criteria. The specific U.S. regulation that authorizes this use is 21 CFR 172.615, which defines permitted ingredients and conditions for chewing gum base applications. International regulatory frameworks may differ in how they classify and permit similar materials. While the U.S. regulatory system provides explicit allowances for specific food additive uses, other jurisdictions may classify plant‑derived masticatory substances under broader categories or require notification for use in food products. Global authorities such as the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) maintain databases of evaluated substances, but a dedicated specification for this particular material may not be present in the public domain or may be encompassed within broader natural resin classifications. As such, definitive international status beyond recognized inventories should be confirmed against local regulatory lists. The lack of a clear numerical acceptable daily intake (ADI) from international bodies reflects the nature of this ingredient’s use: it is typically consumed only in limited categories of products and is included at levels dictated by functional necessity rather than for nutritional or flavoring purposes.
Taste And Functional Properties
GUTTA HANG KANG exhibits a neutral sensory profile in terms of taste and aroma when evaluated as a standalone ingredient. It is generally not considered a flavoring agent; instead, its functional properties are critically important in applications where texture and mechanical behavior are key. In its refined form, it does not contribute significant taste attributes, allowing it to serve as a base that does not interfere with added flavors or sweeteners. Functionally, this material is characterized by its chewable and resilient nature. It contributes elasticity, flexibility, and structural integrity to composite formulations designed for prolonged chewing. These properties arise from its polymeric components, which can withstand physical deformation and return toward their original shape. Because it is largely inert in the mouth, it acts as a scaffold for other ingredients without dissolving rapidly or breaking down under typical chewing conditions. From a stability perspective, GUTTA HANG KANG is relatively stable under normal storage conditions and does not interact chemically with water or common food solvents in a way that would alter its functional behavior. It remains firm at room temperature and softens with heat, permitting processing into a cohesive base that can be mixed with other formulation components. Its utility in food products is thus tied to its capability to impart desired textural qualities without contributing off‑flavors or instability.
Acceptable Daily Intake Explained
An Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) is a regulatory concept used to describe the amount of a food additive that can be consumed every day over a lifetime without appreciable health risk. ADIs are typically expressed in milligrams of additive per kilogram of body weight per day and are based on toxicological data reviewed by expert panels. For many specialized ingredients like GUTTA HANG KANG, a specific numerical ADI may not be established because the regulatory evaluation focuses on permitted use levels within defined product categories rather than broad exposure across diets. When an ADI is established for a substance, it serves as a reference for risk management and labeling decisions. It is not a recommended target intake but rather a safety benchmark that accounts for inherent uncertainties in toxicological data. In the case of GUTTA HANG KANG, regulatory listings such as those by the FDA do not provide a numeric ADI value; instead, they authorize its inclusion in specific products based on functional necessity and historical use. As such, detailed ADI information from international bodies like JECFA may not be publicly available or may not have been established. This absence does not imply a known hazard but reflects the particular context and limited use patterns of masticatory base substances. Consumers generally encounter this material in products like chewing gum at levels that are dictated by formulation requirements. Because it is a structural ingredient rather than a high‑intake additive, overall exposure is typically low compared to widely used additives such as sweeteners or preservatives.
Comparison With Similar Additives
GUTTA HANG KANG can be compared with other chewing gum base components and related masticatory substances to illustrate functional similarities and differences. Typical chewing gum bases include a mixture of elastomers, resins, plasticizers, and fillers. Some commonly referenced base components include polyvinyl acetate, butadiene‑based elastomers, and natural gums such as chicle. Compared to synthetic elastomers like polyvinyl acetate, GUTTA HANG KANG is a naturally derived resin with a long history of use; synthetic elastomers often offer greater uniformity and consistency. Natural gum bases such as chicle also serve similar roles, providing chewable matrix properties. GUTTA HANG KANG differs in botanical origin and specific material properties, but both contribute elasticity and structure. Formulators choose among these based on desired texture, processing characteristics, and regulatory status. Compared with fully synthetic bases, natural materials may exhibit greater variability but can be preferred in certain formulations seeking specific textural attributes. In contrast to bulk food additives like emulsifiers or sweeteners, which are used across broad product categories and often have established ADIs, chewing gum base components like GUTTA HANG KANG are specialized and used in defined applications. Their safety evaluations and regulatory listings are tailored accordingly, emphasizing functional role and permitted use rather than broad dietary exposure.
Safety & Regulations
FDA
- Notes: Approved for use as chewing gum base component under this CFR section as listed in the FDA inventory.
- Regulation: 21 CFR 172.615
EFSA
- Notes: No EFSA specific evaluation or E number available in public databases.
JECFA
- Notes: No specific JECFA evaluation entry located for this additive.
Comments
Please login to leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to share!